Guide · Granting agency or research funder

Connect the research question to the proposed work

Examine scientific quality, protocol adequacy and the evidence expected from a BCI research proposal

A useful first session

  1. Review one proposal

    Inspect the project description and intended contribution before interpreting its outputs

    Review a research proposal
  2. Identify protocol and evidence gaps

    Keep scientific assumptions, missing validation and participant safeguards visible in the review

    Examine the evidence
  3. Compare only when the set is suitable

    For a programme question, compare accessible assessments with compatible scope and note differences in completeness

    Compare assessments
Preview a screen from this path
Project Briefing for the fictional Aurora demonstration
Existing local documentation capture · 23 September 2026 · Aurora is fictional; its inputs, evidence and outputs are illustrative

What you can take away

Specific evidence and protocol questions for proposal review or a future research call

Start with the illustrated guide