Guide · Journal editor or publisher
Follow the claim back to its evidence
Use an accessible assessment to organize editorial questions about a BCI project’s claims, sources and limitations
A useful first session
Read the project in context
Check the intended use, study population and setting against the material being reviewed
Review an assessmentTrace the consequential claims
Return to the original sources and identify unsupported extensions or missing evidence
Trace the evidencePrepare precise review questions
Keep requests for clarification, evidence and disclosure distinct so an author can respond to each
Preview a screen from this path

What you can take away
A focused set of editorial questions tied to the project’s actual evidence
Start with the illustrated guide
