Guide · Journal editor or publisher

Follow the claim back to its evidence

Use an accessible assessment to organize editorial questions about a BCI project’s claims, sources and limitations

A useful first session

  1. Read the project in context

    Check the intended use, study population and setting against the material being reviewed

    Review an assessment
  2. Trace the consequential claims

    Return to the original sources and identify unsupported extensions or missing evidence

    Trace the evidence
  3. Prepare precise review questions

    Keep requests for clarification, evidence and disclosure distinct so an author can respond to each

Preview a screen from this path
Project Briefing for the fictional Aurora demonstration
Existing local documentation capture · 23 September 2026 · Aurora is fictional; its inputs, evidence and outputs are illustrative

What you can take away

A focused set of editorial questions tied to the project’s actual evidence

Start with the illustrated guide